Skip Navigation

The Chinese Journal of International Politics 2007 1(3):305-307; doi:10.1093/cjip/pom006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Reproduced from the Science of International Politics, with kind permission of the authors and the Institute of International Studies, Tsinghua University.

Editor's Notes

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Since the end of the Cold War, the main focus of research for scholars of International Relations has been the theory of deterrence. Their main questions are: under what conditions do states attempt to deter? How do a state's efforts to deter affect the challenging state's beliefs? When is deterrence successful? Preferences, Information and the Deterrence Game by Xiang Ganghua and Wang Yongxian uses a game theoretic approach to answer these questions. The authors begin with a comparison of three main approaches to the study of deterrence: cost-benefit analysis; rational choice analysis; and game theory. They demonstrate the superiority . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?