© The Author 2007.
The Impact of Foreign Threat on the Formation of Chinese and Indian Nationalism*

Corresponding author. Email: alexander.liebman@gmail.com
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
India and China have experienced waves of intense nationalism since their respective Independence and Liberation in the late 1940s. The types of nationalism that have surged in each country, however, have taken strikingly different forms. In China, nationalism has been almost exclusively directed against outsiders—notably the United States and Japan—and imperialism and hegemonism in general. India's nationalism, on the other hand, has primarily consisted of Hindu nationalists mobilizing against a group within their own country, namely Muslims. Chinese nationalism emphasizes historical humiliation at the hands of the West, yet India's nationalism is disconnected from its experience of British colonization. To make a variant on the distinction first made by Hans Kohn, China could be said to exhibit state nationalism while India has seen the emergence of ethnic nationalism.1
Why should this be the case? At first glance, it is not obvious that nationalism in India—a country with a long history
| What is Nationalism? |
|---|
Ethnic Nationalism Versus State Nationalism
Elite Opinion Versus Mass Nationalism
Why Compare China and India?
Measurement
| Nationalism in China and India in the 1990s |
|---|
China
India
Is it Really About Nationalism?
| Regime Type |
|---|
| Ethnic Composition, Location, and Behaviour |
|---|
| Foreign Threat |
|---|
Variance Across Space: Structure of the Foreign Threat Compared
Variance Across Time: China
Variance Across Time: India
| Conclusion and Implications |
|---|